/ log / Mar, 2008 /

Adios, IE8 Meta Mayhem!

I’ve been holding back on a comment on the recent furor about the IE8 meta http-equiv switch. Mainly because the great and the good had it covered, but also because there was already a possible workaround, which John Resig pointed out: Use a HTML5 DOCTYPE.

Dean Hachamovitch and the IE team put out the fire yesterday with a switch of their own:

“We’ve decided that IE8 will, by default, interpret web content in the most standards compliant way it can.”

Great news! Now the legacy application vendors using IE as the platform, and relying on less-than-perfect rendering will bear the burden of telling IE which rendering engine they need. (Another radical idea might be for folks who are refactoring applications to use conditional comments like any good self-respecting developer should.) At least, with this announcement, the folks producing standards-driven code will not face the bizarre requirement of having to tell IE8 to not use IE7’s rendering engine. Makes sense to me guys, what took you so long? OK, the problem is more complex than that. After all, as Nigel Parker of Microsoft pointed out in his follow-up post to Kiwi Baacamp where he entered the debate:

“Microsoft’s view [is] to support backwards compatibility for at least 10 years…”

By anyone’s measure that’s a hefty commitment, and probably leads the field for backwards compatibility. Even more so when you consider that most new “killer apps” are targeted at the cool kids using the latest OS or browser, and often don’t work without Javascript. (Nudge, nudge Twitter.) A fact that always concerns me when you consider that “universality” is at risk of becoming a hackneyed word, and there’s a whole world out there getting online, often with less money than we spend on Starbucks, and the equipment to prove it.

Anyway, I digress. Congratulations to the IE team and the collective intelligence in our community for reaching scientific solutions, intuitively. It just goes to show all the cynics out there that, as well a flaming each other, we also have a rare capacity for collectively recognising Robert M Pirsig’s metaphysics of quality.

Share

Browse More Articles

2 Comments

  1. 1. By tyGosBTS on 4th Mar ’08 at 07:10am

    Thanks for pointing out John Resig’s posted article, I don’t think I'ld seen that one. Thanks also for not flaming the fires of controversy, html 5 looks to be going in the right direction. They mention backwards compatibility also:

    http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-html5-diff-20080122/

    -html 5 differences from 4, I think I can be an early adopter then.

  2. Jon 陳’s profile 2. By Jon 陳 on 7th Mar ’08 at 02:46am

    John Resig’s post was definitely very useful in the midst of the outrage. In fact, even after the recent announcement, it pains me to see so much ridiculous ranting about what I consider to be a practical way for the IE team to meet their backwards compatibility commitment and put their best foot forward.

    See Preparing for HTML5 with Semantic Class Names for more on HTML5 new elements.

Post a Comment

Required sections are marked § . Please remember, debate and courtesy are mutually inclusive.

Personal Details and Authentication
Comment

Lately in the Log

  1. Anakin Tue, 26th Jun 2012 {4}

    I’m pleased to be able to say that Analog is joining forces with…

  2. We, Who Are Web Designers Mon, 19th Sep 2011 {65}

    In 2003, my wife Lowri and I went to a christening party. We were friends…

  3. Ampersand, the Aftermath Wed, 22nd Jun 2011 {3}

    The first Ampersand web typography conference took place in Brighton last…

  4. Design Festival, The Setup, and Upcoming Posts Mon, 20th Jun 2011 {1}

    Wow, this has been a busy period. I’m just back from the Ampersand…

  5. Web Design as Narrative Architecture Wed, 30th Mar 2011 {12}

    Stories are everywhere. When they don’t exist we make up the…

  6. Ides of March Tue, 15th Mar 2011 {4}

    My friend and colleague, Chris, has shared a spiffing idea, the Ideas of…

Remarks from the log

  1. By Anshed in The Paragraph in Web Typography & Design:

    i like your explanation about Paragraphs and puntuation. you have described with a great detail. Thanks for this…

  2. By Anshed in The Paragraph in Web Typography & Design:

    i like your explanation about Paragraphs and puntuation. you have described with a great detail. Thanks for this…

  3. By Anshed in The Paragraph in Web Typography & Design:

    i like your explanation about Paragraphs and puntuation. you have described with a great detail. Thanks for this…

  4. By Sell Any Car Dubai in The Paragraph in Web Typography & Design:

    i like your explanation about Paragraphs and puntuation. you have described with a great detail. Thanks for this…

  5. By Sell Any Car Dubai in The Paragraph in Web Typography & Design:

    i like your explanation about Paragraphs and puntuation. you have described with a great detail. Thanks for this…

  6. By Martin Varesio in Ampersand, the Aftermath:

    His dry, droll, richly-flavoured delivery was a humorous counterpoint to some controversial asides…

People and XFN

Analog folks:

  1. Andrei Zmievski

  2. Chris Shiflett

  3. Jon Gibbins

Friends, colleagues, and authors with interesting voices:

  1. Ben Ramsey

  2. Dan Mall

  3. Denna Jones

  4. Ed Finkler

  5. Elizabeth Naramore

  6. Elliot Jay Stocks

  7. John D. Boardley

  8. Helgi Þormar Þorbjörnsson

  9. Joe Leech

  10. Jos Buivenga

  11. Kester Limb

  12. Nicola Pressi

  13. Patrick H. Lauke

  14. Piotr Fedorczyk

  15. Richard Rutter

  16. Rick Hurst

  17. Sean Coates

  18. Simon Pascal Klein

  19. Terry Chay

Live the questions and one day grow into the answers.